Honesty Meter Logo

Media Manipulation and Bias Detection

Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback


Bias report

HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection

CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!

Objectivity Score

65

Low

Balance Icon
Article Title:  

Rape: S’African agencies slam judge for acquitting Nigerian pastor.  

[ 4/6/2025 1:27:38 AM ] Read on punchng.com
Report Overview: The article presents a mix of objective reporting and subjective opinions. While it reports on the acquittal and reactions from various agencies, it also includes emotionally charged language and unsubstantiated claims, which affect its overall objectivity.
Sides Objectivity Scores
Sides Representation Balance
Favored Side
South African Agencies

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes
  • Biased language

    Use of emotionally charged language that may influence readers' perceptions.

    Phrases like 'slammed the judge' and 'assault on the fight against gender-based violence' are emotionally charged and suggest bias.

    Suggested Changes

    Replace 'slammed the judge' with 'criticized the judge's decision'.

    Replace 'assault on the fight against gender-based violence' with 'a setback in efforts against gender-based violence'.

  • Unsubstantiated claims

    Claims made without sufficient evidence or support.

    The statement that the ruling 'risks undermining the faith that survivors have in the legal system' is presented without evidence.

    Provide evidence or data to support the claim about the ruling's impact on survivors' faith in the legal system.

    Include perspectives from legal experts on the potential impact of the ruling.

  • Appeal to emotion

    Using emotional appeals to persuade the audience.

    Statements about the emotional toll on women and the need for a safe society are emotionally charged.

    Balance emotional appeals with factual information and statistics.

    Include quotes from legal experts or psychologists to provide a more balanced view.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!


- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.