HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Biased language
Using language that implies a subjective opinion or assumption.
Hostin's comments about 'White privilege' and 'pretty privilege' introduce a subjective perspective that may not be relevant to the discussion of the foul in basketball.
Suggested Changes
Remove subjective assumptions about privilege and focus on the player's achievements and the incident itself.
Sensationalism
The use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement.
The description of the foul as 'viral' and the emphasis on the reactions of the co-hosts may exaggerate the significance of the event.
Present the incident in a more neutral tone without emphasizing its viral nature.
Appeal to emotion
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
Goldberg's and Hostin's comments about the nature of basketball and the resilience of the players after fouls are designed to evoke a sense of admiration and may distract from a more objective analysis of the foul's appropriateness.
Provide a balanced view that includes expert opinions on the nature of fouls in basketball without appealing to emotions.
Omission of key information
Leaving out important facts that could change the perception of the reported story.
The article does not provide sufficient context about the rules of basketball fouls or the frequency of such incidents, which could help readers understand whether the foul was indeed a common occurrence.
Include information from official basketball rules or statistics on fouls to provide a clearer picture of the incident's context.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.