Honesty Meter Logo

Media Manipulation and Bias Detection

Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback


Bias report

HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection

CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!

Objectivity Score

40

Low

Balance Icon
Article Title:  

Letters for March 19: President Joe Biden has rightly made his administration reflect America’s diverse population.  

[ 3/18/2024 10:00:06 PM ] Read on dailypress.com
Report Overview: The article contains several instances of biased language, sensationalism, and unsubstantiated claims, which significantly lower its objectivity score.
Sides Objectivity Scores
Sides Representation Balance
Favored Side
President Joe Biden

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes
  • Biased language

    The use of language that is not neutral and shows a clear preference for or against a person or issue.

    The phrases 'productive and inclusive leadership of President Joe Biden' and 'extreme conservative apologist' show a clear bias towards one side and against the other.

    Suggested Changes

    Use neutral language to describe political figures and their actions.

    Avoid labeling individuals with charged terms like 'extreme conservative apologist'.

  • Sensationalism

    The use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement.

    Statements like 'The diversity of the American voters and their love of democracy will never acquiesce to the unpatriotic division that is afoot in the Republican Party' are sensational and designed to provoke a strong emotional response rather than provide an objective analysis.

    Present political opinions and situations without using emotionally charged or sensational language.

  • Unsubstantiated claims

    Claims that are presented without the necessary evidence or support.

    The claim that 'The dissemination of untruths is the cherished go-to move of the Republican Party' is a broad, unsubstantiated generalization.

    Provide evidence when making claims about a group's behavior or strategies.

  • Appeal to emotion

    Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.

    The article uses phrases like 'please would someone please explain to me why anyone would want him to be our next president?' to elicit an emotional response rather than presenting a reasoned argument.

    Focus on factual information and logical reasoning rather than emotional appeals.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!


- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.