HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Sensationalism
Use of dramatic language to provoke interest.
The title and content use dramatic language such as 'wage another legal battle' and 'standing up to bullies' to sensationalize the legal dispute.
Suggested Changes
Use neutral language to describe the legal situation, such as 'continues legal proceedings'.
Biased language
Language that shows preference for one side over another.
The article uses positive language to describe Brad Pitt's actions and intentions, such as 'standing firm for what he believes in', without providing a similar portrayal of Angelina Jolie's perspective.
Provide a balanced view by including supportive details or statements from both parties.
Appeal to emotion
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article appeals to emotions by framing Brad Pitt as fighting against 'bullies' and 'defending his own people, principles and the truth', which may evoke sympathy without providing a balanced argument.
Avoid emotionally charged language and focus on the factual aspects of the legal dispute.
Omission of key information
Leaving out important details that could change the perception of the story.
The article does not provide sufficient information about Angelina Jolie's side of the story or her reasons for selling her share, which could be key to understanding the full context of the dispute.
Include Angelina Jolie's stated reasons or legal arguments for selling her share to provide a more complete picture.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.