HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Sensationalism
Use of sensational language to provoke interest at the expense of accuracy.
The title 'Joe Biden is once again taking a ‘wrecking ball’ to America’s housing market' is sensational and implies destruction without providing evidence.
Suggested Changes
Use a more neutral title that reflects the content of the article without implying intent or outcome.
Biased language
Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's bias.
Phrases like 'vote buying scheme', 'wrecking ball benevolence', and 'reckless economic policies' indicate a strong bias against the policies discussed.
Replace biased phrases with neutral descriptions of the policies and their potential effects.
Omission of key information
Leaving out information that is crucial to understanding the full context.
The article does not provide information on the rationale behind the Biden administration's policies or any potential benefits.
Include information from the Biden administration or other sources that explain the purpose and expected outcomes of the policies.
Unbalanced reporting
Presenting one side of an argument without adequate representation of opposing viewpoints.
The article presents a one-sided view that is critical of Biden's policies without offering a balanced discussion.
Present views from both critics and supporters of the policies to provide a balanced perspective.
Unsubstantiated claims
Claims made without evidence to support them.
The article makes claims about the negative impact of Biden's policies without providing data or evidence to back them up.
Provide evidence, data, or sources to substantiate the claims made about the policies' impact.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.