Honesty Meter Logo

Media Manipulation and Bias Detection

Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback


Bias report

HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection

CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!

Objectivity Score

45

Low

Balance Icon
Article Title:  

This group of Arab American voters are powerful and furious. Now they're abandoning Joe Biden.  

[ 3/3/2024 10:56:16 PM ] Read on abc.net.au
Report Overview: The article contains several manipulations such as sensationalism, biased language, omission of key information, unbalanced reporting, unsubstantiated claims, and appeal to emotion. These manipulations affect the objectivity of the content, leading to a lower score.
Sides Objectivity Scores
Sides Representation Balance
Favored Side
Arab American Voters

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes
  • Sensationalism

    Use of shocking or exciting language at the expense of accuracy to provoke public interest.

    The article uses phrases like 'brutal campaign in Gaza' and 'genocide' to describe the conflict, which are emotionally charged and may not accurately represent the complexity of the situation.

    Suggested Changes

    Use neutral language to describe the conflict and provide context for such claims.

  • Biased language

    Language that is partial or prejudiced towards particular views or groups.

    Terms like 'brutal campaign' and 'genocide' indicate a bias against Israel's actions without providing a balanced perspective.

    Include statements from both sides of the conflict to provide a balanced view.

  • Omission of key information

    Leaving out important facts that could change the reader's understanding of the situation.

    The article does not provide sufficient context about the conflict, such as the reasons behind Israel's military actions or the role of Hamas.

    Include information about the causes of the conflict and the perspectives of both sides.

  • Unbalanced reporting

    Reporting that disproportionately covers one side of an issue.

    The article focuses heavily on the Arab American voters' perspective and grievances with Biden, with little coverage of Biden's policies or responses.

    Provide more information on Biden's policies and the reasons behind his decisions.

  • Unsubstantiated claims

    Claims that are presented without evidence or support.

    The article presents the claim of 'genocide' without providing evidence or a legal basis for such a characterization.

    Clarify that the term 'genocide' is a legal definition and provide evidence if such a claim is made.

  • Appeal to emotion

    Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.

    The article uses emotional language and personal stories to evoke sympathy for the Arab American voters without providing a balanced view of the political situation.

    Focus on presenting facts and a range of perspectives rather than relying on emotional anecdotes.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!


- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.