HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Sensationalism
Use of sensational language to provoke interest or excitement at the expense of accuracy.
The headline and the framing of the article suggest a scandalous connection without providing substantial evidence.
Suggested Changes
Use a more neutral headline and provide evidence for claims.
Misleading Headlines
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline implies a definitive action by Joe Biden, while the content only discusses allegations.
Rewrite the headline to reflect the allegations as claims, not facts.
Biased Language
Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's prejudice.
Phrases like 'shady business deals' suggest a negative connotation without conclusive evidence.
Use neutral language to describe business dealings.
Unbalanced Reporting
Reporting that disproportionately focuses on one side of an issue.
The article focuses heavily on allegations against Joe Biden without providing a balanced view or response from Biden's representatives.
Include statements or responses from Joe Biden's representatives.
Selective Use of Sources
Choosing sources that support one side of an argument while ignoring others.
The article relies on a single source, Jason Galanis, who has a vested interest in the narrative.
Incorporate multiple sources, including those that may have counterarguments.
Unsubstantiated Claims
Claims that are not supported by evidence.
The article presents claims from Jason Galanis without corroborating evidence.
Provide evidence to support the claims made by Galanis.
Appeal to Authority
Using an authority figure's opinion as evidence.
The article uses Galanis' position as a former associate to lend credibility to his claims.
Clarify that the authority's opinion is not evidence of truth.
Omission of Key Information
Leaving out information that is crucial to understanding the full context.
The article does not mention the potential bias of Galanis or the lack of charges against Joe Biden.
Include information about Galanis' potential bias and the current status of any legal proceedings against Joe Biden.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.