Honesty Meter Logo

Media Manipulation and Bias Detection

Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback


Bias report

HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection

CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!

Objectivity Score

65

Low

Balance Icon
Article Title:  

Vladimir Putin says he prefers more ‘predictable’ Joe Biden over Donald Trump.  

[ 2/14/2024 10:48:25 PM ] Read on scmp.com
Report Overview: The article contains instances of biased language, misleading statements, and omission of key information which affect its objectivity. The presentation of Putin's preference for Biden over Trump is not balanced, and there are subtle implications that may lead readers to form biased opinions.
Sides Objectivity Scores
Sides Representation Balance
Favored Side
Putin/Biden

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes
  • Biased language

    The use of phrases that carry a positive or negative connotation without providing evidence.

    The phrase 'old school politician' may imply a positive bias towards Biden, suggesting reliability and experience without substantiation.

    Suggested Changes

    Replace 'old school politician' with 'politician with extensive experience in public service'.

  • Omission of key information

    Leaving out important details that could change the reader's perception.

    The article does not provide context for Biden's 'confusion' incidents, which could be relevant to understanding the situation fully.

    Include additional information about the circumstances of Biden's confusion incidents.

  • Misleading statements

    Statements that may be true but are presented in a way that can mislead the reader.

    The article implies that Trump's confusion of names is on par with Biden's, which may not be equivalent in severity or frequency.

    Clarify the frequency and context of Trump's confusion of names compared to Biden's.

  • Unbalanced reporting

    Presenting one side more favorably than the other without a neutral standpoint.

    The article seems to focus more on Biden's age and health issues than on Trump's, which could lead to an unbalanced perception of both candidates.

    Provide a more balanced view of both candidates' health and age concerns.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!


- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.