HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Sensationalism
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The title 'SEAN HANNITY: New Gallup surveys spell a lot more trouble for Joe Biden' uses sensationalism to attract attention by suggesting dramatic trouble for Joe Biden.
Suggested Changes
Use a more neutral title that reflects the content of the article without suggesting a crisis, such as 'Gallup Surveys Indicate Shifts in Key Demographics for Democrats'.
Biased language
Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's prejudices.
Phrases like 'giggling vice president' and 'struggle with key demographics' show a lack of neutrality and inject the author's opinion into the reporting.
Replace 'giggling vice president' with 'Vice President Harris' and 'struggle with key demographics' with 'show changes in key demographic support'.
Unbalanced reporting
Presenting one side of an argument or story without a counterbalancing perspective.
The article focuses heavily on the negative polling for Democrats and Biden without providing context or comparison to other parties or historical data.
Include information on how the polling compares to historical trends or to the current standing of other political parties.
Omission of key information
Leaving out important details that could change the perception of the story.
The article does not provide information on the methodology of the polls or the margin of error, which are important for understanding the reliability of the data.
Include details about the methodology of the Gallup surveys and the margin of error to provide a clearer picture of the data's reliability.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.