HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Sensationalism
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke excitement, shock, or interest.
The article uses sensationalism by describing an 'awkward meeting' and stating that fans 'can't work out who is trolling'. This creates a sense of drama and intrigue.
Suggested Changes
Present the meeting as a casual interaction instead of an 'awkward' one.
Avoid making exaggerated claims about fans' confusion.
Misleading headlines
Using headlines that are intentionally vague or misleading to attract attention.
The headline 'Gvardiol and iShowSpeed in awkward meeting and fans can't work out who is trolling' is misleading as it suggests a contentious or confrontational interaction between the two individuals, which is not supported by the content of the article.
Use a more accurate and descriptive headline that reflects the actual content of the article.
Cherry-picking data
Selectively choosing data or information that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory evidence.
The article cherry-picks quotes from social media users to create the impression that there is confusion and controversy surrounding the interaction between Gvardiol and iShowSpeed.
Include a more balanced selection of quotes from social media users to provide a more accurate representation of public opinion.
Omission of key information
Leaving out important details or facts that may significantly impact the interpretation of the article.
The article fails to provide any context or background information about Gvardiol, iShowSpeed, or the 2023 Ballon d'Or event, which may be relevant for readers to fully understand the situation.
Include a brief introduction or background information about Gvardiol, iShowSpeed, and the 2023 Ballon d'Or event.
Biased language
Using language that favors one side or viewpoint over others.
The article uses biased language by describing Gvardiol as 'too funny' and implying that iShowSpeed was 'trolled'. This creates a positive perception of Gvardiol and a negative perception of iShowSpeed.
Use neutral language to describe the actions and reactions of both Gvardiol and iShowSpeed.
Unbalanced reporting
Presenting information in a way that disproportionately favors one side or viewpoint.
The article focuses more on Gvardiol's actions and reactions, while providing limited information about iShowSpeed. This creates an imbalance in the reporting.
Provide more information and context about iShowSpeed's perspective and reactions to create a more balanced representation of both individuals.
Clickbait
Using sensational or intriguing headlines or content to attract clicks and views.
The article includes unrelated information about Jude Bellingham, TNT Sports, and Amazon Prime subscription, which is not relevant to the main topic of Gvardiol and iShowSpeed's interaction.
Remove unrelated information and focus on the main topic of Gvardiol and iShowSpeed's interaction.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.