Honesty Meter Logo

Media Manipulation and Bias Detection

Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback


Bias report

HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection

CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!

Objectivity Score

85

High

Balance Icon
Article Title:  

Melissa Etheridge: Why I didn’t use Brad Pitt as a sperm donor.  

[ 7/9/2024 3:24:39 PM ] Read on nypost.com
Report Overview: The article presents a personal story and interview content with Melissa Etheridge, focusing on her decisions regarding sperm donors and her relationships. While the article is largely factual and recounts Etheridge's statements and past events, there are instances of sensationalism and appeal to emotion, particularly in the title and the discussion of Brad Pitt's personal life.
Sides Objectivity Scores
Sides Representation Balance
Favored Side
Melissa Etheridge

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes
  • Sensationalism

    Use of sensational language to provoke interest.

    The article title 'Melissa Etheridge: Why I didn’t use Brad Pitt as a sperm donor' uses sensationalism to attract readers' attention by highlighting a celebrity connection in a personal decision.

    Suggested Changes

    Use a more neutral title such as 'Melissa Etheridge Discusses Sperm Donor Decisions in New Documentary'

  • Appeal to emotion

    Attempts to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.

    The section discussing Brad Pitt's personal life and custody battles ('The reminders that he’s lost his children, is of course not easy for Brad. He loves his children and misses them. It’s very sad,' the insider told the outlet) appeals to emotion by focusing on the emotional distress of a celebrity, which is not directly relevant to the main topic of the article.

    Remove or rephrase the section to focus on the main topic without delving into emotionally charged details of Brad Pitt's personal life.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!


- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.