Honesty Meter Logo

Media Manipulation and Bias Detection

Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback


Bias report

HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection

CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!

Objectivity Score

70

Medium

Balance Icon
Article Title:  

Availability, 3-point shooting separate Julius Randle from Zion Williamson.  

[ 10/28/2023 11:05:47 PM ] Read on nydailynews.com
Report Overview: The article contains some manipulations such as cherry-picking data, biased language, and unbalanced reporting. However, it also provides some objective information about the differences between Julius Randle and Zion Williamson in terms of their playing style and availability. Overall, the article is moderately objective.
Sides Objectivity Scores
Sides Representation Balance
Favored Side
Julius Randle

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes
  • Cherry-picking data

    The article selectively presents data about Julius Randle's three-point shooting and availability compared to Zion Williamson.

    The article highlights Randle's improvement in three-point shooting and his higher number of games played compared to Williamson. It fails to mention other aspects of their games or provide a balanced perspective.

    Suggested Changes

    Include more information about Williamson's strengths and contributions to the game.

    Provide a more balanced comparison between Randle and Williamson.

  • Biased language

    The article uses biased language to favor Julius Randle over Zion Williamson.

    The article includes quotes from coaches praising Randle's game and making positive statements about him, while not providing similar positive statements about Williamson.

    Use neutral language when discussing the players and their abilities.

    Include quotes or statements that highlight Williamson's strengths and potential.

  • Unbalanced reporting

    The article provides more information and analysis about Julius Randle compared to Zion Williamson.

    The article includes more quotes and analysis about Randle's game, his improvement, and his availability, while providing less information about Williamson's game and potential.

    Include more information and analysis about Williamson's game and potential.

    Provide a more balanced coverage of both players.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!


- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.