Honesty Meter Logo

Media Manipulation and Bias Detection

Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback


Bias report

HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection

CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!

Objectivity Score

70

Medium

Balance Icon
Article Title:  

SAG-AFTRA Breaks Down Why George Clooney-Led Proposal to Help End Strike Wouldn't Work.  

[ 10/20/2023 5:44:10 PM ] Read on in.ign.com
Report Overview: The article contains some manipulations such as biased language, omission of key information, and unbalanced reporting. However, it also provides some objective information and quotes from both sides.
Sides Objectivity Scores
Sides Representation Balance
Favored Side
SAG-AFTRA

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes
  • Biased language

    The article uses biased language to favor SAG-AFTRA.

    The article refers to the A-listers' proposal as 'well-intentioned' and 'generous,' while the guild's rejection is explained as being 'gracious.' This language implies that SAG-AFTRA is in the right and the A-listers' proposal is commendable.

    Suggested Changes

    Use neutral language to describe both sides' actions and intentions.

    Avoid using subjective terms that imply one side is more favorable than the other.

  • Omission of key information

    The article omits key information about the A-listers' proposal.

    The article does not provide details about why the A-listers believe removing the $1 million cap on union membership dues would benefit the guild and its members. This omission makes it difficult to fully understand their proposal and evaluate its merits.

    Include more information about the A-listers' reasoning behind their proposal.

    Provide a balanced explanation of both sides' arguments.

  • Unbalanced reporting

    The article provides more information and quotes from SAG-AFTRA than from the A-listers.

    The article includes multiple quotes from SAG-AFTRA representatives explaining their reasons for rejecting the proposal, while only providing one quote from George Clooney. This unbalanced reporting gives more weight to SAG-AFTRA's perspective.

    Include more quotes and perspectives from the A-listers to provide a balanced view of the situation.

    Ensure that both sides are given equal opportunity to present their arguments.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!


- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.