Honesty Meter Logo

Media Manipulation and Bias Detection

Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback


Bias report

HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection

CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!

Objectivity Score

70

Medium

Balance Icon
Article Title:  

Court rules Lady Gaga doesn't have to pay lost dog reward money.  

[ 10/3/2023 10:53:26 PM ] Read on postguam.com
Report Overview: The article has a score of 70 out of 100, indicating that it is moderately objective. There are several instances of manipulations found in the article, which have affected its objectivity.
Sides Objectivity Scores
Sides Representation Balance
Favored Side
Lady Gaga

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes
  • Biased language

    The use of biased language can influence the reader's perception of the events.

    The article refers to Jennifer McBride as the 'plaintiff' and Lady Gaga as the 'Bad Romance' singer, which can create a negative impression of McBride and a positive impression of Lady Gaga.

    Suggested Changes

    Use neutral language when referring to both parties involved.

    Avoid using labels or nicknames that may influence the reader's perception.

  • Omission of key information

    Omitting key information can lead to a biased representation of the events.

    The article does not provide details about the evidence or arguments presented by Jennifer McBride's attorney, which may affect the reader's understanding of her perspective.

    Include relevant information about the evidence and arguments presented by both parties.

    Provide a balanced representation of the events by including all significant details.

  • Appeal to authority

    An appeal to authority can manipulate the reader's perception by relying on the credibility of a person or entity.

    The article mentions that Judge Holly J. Fujie ruled Jennifer's complaint as 'legally insufficient in its entirety,' which may influence the reader to accept this ruling without questioning it.

    Provide a balanced perspective by including different viewpoints on the judge's ruling.

    Encourage critical thinking by presenting the reader with different interpretations of the ruling.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!


- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.